View Single Post
  #9  
Old 01-13-2011, 01:46 AM
ILuvPizzaTimes10's Avatar
ILuvPizzaTimes10 ILuvPizzaTimes10 is offline
YOUR ALL GUNNA DIE!!!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Randolph, MA
Posts: 9,380
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula413 View Post
No, the cam was the same 93-95, and only a tiny bit different from 96-97. 93-95 are all rated at 275 hp stock, it's not likely that a '93 would be significantly faster or slower than a 94-95.

incorrect. cams are different. ive never been able to track down an Actual Spec on the cam BUT they are different numbers from the GM Book. 93 had 19lb injectors. 94+ has 24. exhaust manifolds are COMPLETLY different. smog pump is mounted on the block 1993 and on the frame rail 94+. cylinder heads as well are different casting numbers that flow the best(debatable) but aren't as portable friendly. Intake is again different as the guys covered, But as i recently found out(suicidal racing) they are better for porting. the front suspension has SLIGHT differences. most aftermarket parts will fit But the geometery gets wierd on the alignment rack. i think its the over all height of the knuckle. 94+ is shorter. by fractions of an inch. the 93 offered 2 ratio choices in the T56. if you had a 2.73 rear ratio the first gear of the 6 speed was 3.07. if you had a 3.23 as i did stock the first gear was the Sought after 2.97 ratio. can i go on? or did i cover the basics? Ohh and the valve springs and retainers are different. Almost all of this is the same for 92-93 vette as well. PM me if you wanna know more.
__________________


1998 Firebird:buncha parts thats used to make it go fast..... not so much anymore.
BAAAAAA!!!!!!
Reply With Quote