North East F-Body Association

Page 3 of 4

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

North East F-Body Association (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/index.php)

- Pictures/Videos (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/forumdisplay.php?f=12)

- - 2011 5.slow (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/showthread.php?t=1136)

DemonWithin99

05-15-2010 07:31 AM

I saw something about the shitstangs new TCC button, you need to hold it down for 5-7sec for it to disengage. lol not like our easy button....

Batman

05-15-2010 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sciff5 (Post 19642)

Yeah but the car is also trapping a good 5-6mph on avg faster than a common stock f body.

Fbody owners are comparing the best times recorded (with good 60's) ever with a stock ls1 compared to avg magazine times done on stock tires on zero mile engines. You dont catch and then pass a car that has enough power to post up 5mph better trap speeds.

To give you reference 5-6 mph is the difference between a stock ls1 and a stock honda s2000. If you replaced the camaro in this video with an S2000 and the ford with a camaro.. I think you'de feel much different and you'd prob be laughing at the honda guys who think their car is faster than a camaro.

Of course this is an Fbody site and its not unbelievable but lets be realistic here guys. I think if anything the fbody has some mods. Lid/exhaust/tune maybe gears would be all it needs to make the difference

Again GT 500, 12.8 @ 120+

c4boom

05-15-2010 02:22 PM

OK the way i LOOk at it I trap 12.7's at 109-112 my car is 3860 lbs there is no way my car is puting out 425 HP at the crank with just exhaust and a lid. so where dose that leave the mustang. I want to see one hit the rollers.

smokinss

05-15-2010 02:54 PM

Here is another vid of one done by Evolution performance. Its the first one into the 11s. From what I gather it has a off road x and a catback, tune, and some other goodies. Plus not too mention it has really light weight bogarts

<object style="height: 344px; width: 425px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5Qc4Xb7G1ck"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5Qc4Xb7G1ck" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></object>

ILuvPizzaTimes10

05-15-2010 04:28 PM

hate to tell yah but that cars cammed too. just saying. listen to it stablilize on the dyno. its got a NOTICABLE stumble at low rpm's. Still not a bad car. cam only bolt on Fbuckets have been running high 11's sence 1998........

smokinss

05-15-2010 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILuvPizzaTimes10 (Post 19675)

Not too sure about that one though. I got this vid from another lsx site and it didnt say anything about it being cammed. All though it would make much more sense.

Batman

05-15-2010 07:07 PM

There are too many factors to consider, weight, gearing, tires, suspension etc. HP means jack shit at the race track, it depends on where the HP comes in, where it peaks and how the car is set up. The biggest problem I see with the 5.0 is it is still an OHC engine and down low it is gonna get beat up by a pushrod engine. I am sure ti will have the same achilles heel the 4.6 and the 5.4 do, you need to turn more RPM to get em going.

84ta406

05-15-2010 07:16 PM

I wonder how much aerodynamics come into play as well?

That EP car was all over yellow bullet and it is not cammed. They've been playing with the TI- VCT a lot!

c4boom

05-16-2010 12:47 AM

ya same thing you advance or retard the cam same results. but think about this he was chirping 4th on street tires and 3rd with the M&H's no way thats the stock clutch

TBerry95z28

05-16-2010 04:16 AM

either way GAY! its a ford haha

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Page 3 of 4

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page