Go Back   North East F-Body Association > Main Forum > New Members

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-12-2014, 02:48 PM
black heartbeat black heartbeat is offline
Post Whore
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mashpee, Cape Cod
Posts: 1,273
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 4
Thanks (Received): 18
Likes (Given): 22
Likes (Received): 76
Dislikes (Given): 1
Dislikes (Received): 3
Default

Sorry to hear about your situation, best if luck!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-12-2014, 03:31 PM
P-E-Z P-E-Z is offline
New User (change by User CP, Edit Your Details)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Hartford ct
Posts: 14
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 1
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 1
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Default

this is what is left http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/c...psc73cc695.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-12-2014, 04:38 PM
P-E-Z P-E-Z is offline
New User (change by User CP, Edit Your Details)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Hartford ct
Posts: 14
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 1
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 1
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z28 View Post
Idk about all that haha
My frat brother was staff writer at consumer reports. It was tested on a Sunday when they closed on their test equipment in Colchester Ct, its accurate. The engine was designed with the help of former NASCAR driver/car owner who raced at the Riverside Motor Speedway. His car engine was too big for for Stafford or Waterford so stopped racing. He described it as faster greased snot.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-12-2014, 06:21 PM
My84Z's Avatar
My84Z My84Z is offline
Post Whore
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: dartmouth
Posts: 2,925
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 4
Thanks (Received): 57
Likes (Given): 7
Likes (Received): 240
Dislikes (Given): 6
Dislikes (Received): 24
Default

So you are saying your 305 700r4 car went 175 mph? Cause your car is making less then 300 hp especially on that stock computer management a "chip" that is actually a prom can only do so much. My car made 380 rwhp and it was lucky to be in the 160's with a 6 speed and it took awhile to get there. With 3:42 gears and a 700r4 which you would have to do it in d so it would be a 1:1 ratio you would have to be at well over 6500 cause at 6k with a tpi setup you are well out of steam. At 6k with 3:45 gears and 28" tall tires you would roughly be at 142mph
__________________

2000 SS Procharger
98 Z vert turbo
07 TB SS cai catback and tune
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-12-2014, 07:02 PM
P-E-Z P-E-Z is offline
New User (change by User CP, Edit Your Details)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Hartford ct
Posts: 14
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 1
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 1
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Default

Top speed on the dynamo with pro test driver doing doing it. It was not TPI its carb with dual ram air induction. It had hi pro computer chip in it. You have to remember it did not max in rpms where they normally after market cam. reved higher. The horsepower test at the wheels was 304 hp. Gross hp had to be much higher.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-12-2014, 07:25 PM
My84Z's Avatar
My84Z My84Z is offline
Post Whore
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: dartmouth
Posts: 2,925
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 4
Thanks (Received): 57
Likes (Given): 7
Likes (Received): 240
Dislikes (Given): 6
Dislikes (Received): 24
Default

If it was a carb you wouldn't have a chip in it. The chip is for the fuel injection and timing. Dynamo? I am assuming you mean dynomometer or dyno for short and in which case 305 hp is not alot at all mu stock ls1 did that. Your gearing would not allow 175 mph maybe the screen said that but it just can't happen. I understand that you had a cam and heads but it is a 305 and it is a conventional small block. It won't make much past 6-6500 max and even then doubtful. We are car guys here and understand how things work.
__________________

2000 SS Procharger
98 Z vert turbo
07 TB SS cai catback and tune
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-12-2014, 07:25 PM
My84Z's Avatar
My84Z My84Z is offline
Post Whore
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: dartmouth
Posts: 2,925
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 4
Thanks (Received): 57
Likes (Given): 7
Likes (Received): 240
Dislikes (Given): 6
Dislikes (Received): 24
Default

I don't mean to be negative to you I think you are severely uninformed an either people were looking for money from you or just being extra nice. I am not trying to be a dick i was trying to inform ya but I am not gonna say anymore I wish all the best to you man I hope things work out.
__________________

2000 SS Procharger
98 Z vert turbo
07 TB SS cai catback and tune
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-12-2014, 10:29 PM
P-E-Z P-E-Z is offline
New User (change by User CP, Edit Your Details)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Hartford ct
Posts: 14
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 1
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 1
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by My84Z View Post
If it was a carb you wouldn't have a chip in it. The chip is for the fuel injection and timing. Dynamo? I am assuming you mean dynomometer or dyno for short and in which case 305 hp is not alot at all mu stock ls1 did that. Your gearing would not allow 175 mph maybe the screen said that but it just can't happen. I understand that you had a cam and heads but it is a 305 and it is a conventional small block. It won't make much past 6-6500 max and even then doubtful. We are car guys here and understand how things work.
Once I am back in my Condo I scan post the report. I contacted GM Historian 1997 and asked what was highest known speed of 305. I told what got, they said its wasn't possible. Well until I sent copy of the report to them. They where shocked and had an engineer from Chevy call wanted me he wanted a copy test report and all part numbers. Feel free not believe. Btw The cylinder heads not 305 heads the were supposed to be for 350-400 cid only.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-12-2014, 10:48 PM
84ta406 84ta406 is offline
Future club Dangle member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 1,802
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 15
Thanks (Received): 16
Likes (Given): 58
Likes (Received): 54
Dislikes (Given): 2
Dislikes (Received): 3
Default

You cant fit anything larger than 2.02/ 1.6 valves in a 305 and thats not nearly enough air to breathe for 175mph. Also to fit those you need atleast a .030 overbore or else the valves would be shrouded. My last engine, my 406ci small block made 550+hp and it still wouldnt go 175mph in my car with a TH400 and 3.50 gearing. The fastest SS/SE 305 is in the 10's which still isnt enough power for 175. Im not gonna say its impossible because Ive seen weirder shit done but I'm calling B.S. on that. Not trying to sound like a dick but theres some pretty damn knowledgeable people on here.
__________________
5.3L LSx, Fbody .500 cam, TH400, 4500 Stall, Moser 9"
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-12-2014, 11:10 PM
P-E-Z P-E-Z is offline
New User (change by User CP, Edit Your Details)
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Hartford ct
Posts: 14
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given): 0
Thanks (Received): 1
Likes (Given): 0
Likes (Received): 1
Dislikes (Given): 0
Dislikes (Received): 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84ta406 View Post
You cant fit anything larger than 2.02/ 1.6 valves in a 305 and thats not nearly enough air to breathe for 175mph. Also to fit those you need atleast a .030 overbore or else the valves would be shrouded. My last engine, my 406ci small block made 550+hp and it still wouldnt go 175mph in my car with a TH400 and 3.50 gearing. The fastest SS/SE 305 is in the 10's which still isnt enough power for 175. Im not gonna say its impossible because Ive seen weirder shit done but I'm calling B.S. on that. Not trying to sound like a dick but theres some pretty damn knowledgeable people on here.
these heads on and barely cleared. http://www.trickflow.com/search.asp?...=KeywordSearch said test report once I can move back in my condo.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.